balancing traditional and contemporary norms
The region is at the heart of a contentious discussion about” Asian values” as a result of Asian countries ‘ economic successes https://asianbrides.org/sri-lankan-women/, which are frequently achieved using quite different methods than those of the West. The alleged unity of Eastern economic models, social ideals and social practices, and the responsibility of social factors in East Asia’s development as an global energy have been the main topics of discussion in this debate.
An incensed defensiveness by East Asians has always been a consistent response to these criticisms. The characterizations of their societies that have emerged in the process are no flattering: they are said to be self- reliant, but miraculously universalist, centered on individual relationships and common obligation https://www.thoughtco.com/most-important-women-in-world-history-3528530 rather than chilly letter of the law – even though the latter is called upon to enforce those values, respectful of hierarchy and authority, and state interventionist, maybe into the private space of individuals.
This defensiveness is a natural reaction to the fact that the societies involved are experiencing an unprecedented level of change as a result of globalizing forces. The heart of this discussion is, however, the way in which these societies are attempting to create norms of governance and social organization that will be viewed by their citizens.
This is being done at the local level, in public forums, in local government, and in their respective social and religious institutions. According to my informal poll of respondents in 1994 and 1996, the emphasis that the majority of Asians place on maintaining an organized society even at the expense of some individual freedoms is a good idea.